qatsi (qatsi) wrote,

Monetarist, Marxist or Feudalist

Prompted by a combo of letters about the Soham case in The Independent and verlaine's recent post about library recruitment.

The free-market view allows people to judge the value of goods and services they want, and pay appropriately, then they will get the value of goods and services they want.

A more collectivist view allows a single choice to be made on behalf of a group of people, averaging out individual highs and lows in valuing goods and services. Everyone receives fair value based on the average.

A feudalist view: bugger that! Serf, go and harvest the fields/deal with the rubbish/fetch me some new books from the library, etc.

The problem is, in either the free-market or collectivist approach, evidence shows that most people choose the lowest-cost option, even if they do not want the lowest level of service. Clearly the only way out is to become Lord of the Manor. Join the DNRC now!
Tags: politics
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.