qatsi (qatsi) wrote,
qatsi
qatsi

  • Mood:

The Old Turks

The reason for today's trip to London with kharin was to visit the Royal Academy's Turks exhibition.

uitlander and I have already agreed that we are both Meldrews, but I really do believe the behaviour of museum visitors is deteriorating. Like the Aztecs exhibition a couple of years ago, it was very busy, and people dithered, fiddled with their audio guides, stuck their elbows over the exhibit captions, and butted their way in to look at the paintings close-up. Accessibility is one thing, but blotting out other punters' views of the exhibits by holding the large-print cards against the cases is merely replacing one form of rudeness with another. Is there no such thing as etiquette any more? It took us nearly three hours to get through the exhibition, and this aspect was rather draining.

And the exhibition itself? Well, its scale and scope is certainly impressive: the exhibits seemed to range beyond the stated 600-1600AD at both ends. There's a mixture of paintings and drawings, carvings and artefacts. The Turks are impossible to define singularly: they encompass many ethnicities, many religions and many languages. The scripts ranged from runic through Chinese and Arabic (though one visitor, "assisting" the others, said he spoke Arabic but couldn't read these scripts, which he thought were Turkic). The empires across Asia Minor, Persia and Central Asia evolved in many forms, and separate rooms attempt to capture their different flavours.

Logistically, the exhibition has some flaws. It is probably inevitable that many of the exhibits must be displayed in subdued lighting, but this does mean it is difficult not to cast one's own shadow over the exhibit labels. There appeared to be one or two errors and omissions in the labelling. The section on "Muhammed of the Black Pen" contained many drawings to a page, but each label described only one of them. So what was the picture that seemed to show two men being simultaneously crucified and burned at the stake? It certainly didn't have any obvious connection to its partner, which was described by the captions. The numbering systems are also confusing. Why have (at least) three different numbering schemes - the main catalogue, the audio guide entries, and the children's trail guide? Couldn't they all use one single scheme? Wouldn't that be easier?

The RA's restaurant also seems to have gone downhill - though menu-wise we may just have picked a bad day. In the end we headed back to Paddington and the reliable West Cornwall Pasty Company emporium, before doing battle again with the trains. The return journey, on 1970s rolling stock, was far more bearable. Clearly, the old ones are best.
Tags: exhibitions
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 3 comments