qatsi (qatsi) wrote,

ID Cards

So, David Blunkett wants us all to have one. And eventually, we will all have to have one, according to his plans. Now I don't really object to having an ID card. But I do find it dishonest and unfair to charge individuals for them, if they will be compulsory.

His argument seems to be, that it's just like a driving licence or passport, and you have to pay for those. But it is not like either of those if it is compulsory. People can choose not to have a driving licence or passport, and choosing to have one of those documents is an implicit sign that you can afford it (as you are going to be doing something with a motor vehicle, or travelling abroad, neither of which are cheap).

Furthermore, he seemed on Channel 4 News, adamant that ID cards should not be paid for out of general taxation (maybe that's because Mr Brown isn't too keen on them, or maybe it's just because Mr Brown doesn't like spending money). But if you're going to enforce ID cards and require everyone to pay a flat fee for them, isn't that taxation by stealth? (err, actually, it sounds more like a Poll Tax - ed).

I'm not necessarily against ID cards, but I thought in Blair's Brave New World we were going to be honest about tax-and-spend. Did I miss something?
Tags: politics
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment